The New Female Hostel, a one-storey building located in a quiet, serene area in the university, has been a subject of interest among students and educators alike. While the hostel’s facilities and environment have been praised, its rules and regulations have sparked a heated debate among its residents.
According to students, the rules are strict and restrictive. “No noise-making is allowed,” said Ene Daniel, a resident of the hostel. “This means that we have to be very quiet, even when we’re studying or relaxing in our rooms.” Abigail, another resident, expressed frustration with the rules, saying that she feels unable to go out freely without fear of being locked outside or punished.
The rules also include a curfew, which students say is restrictive. “The curfew is okay, but not too okay,” said Daniel. “Sometimes, I need to study late at night, but the curfew makes it difficult for me to do so.”
Despite the criticisms, Mr. Mark Ardo, the patron of the hostel, defended the rules as “fair and lenient.” According to Ardo, the rules are necessary because the hostel is intended for “rigorous reading and not for play.” Ardo also claimed that students are “just overreacting and exaggerating” and that the rules are “simple and can be adhered to easily.”
However, not all students agree with Ardo’s assessment. A student, who wishes to remain anonymous, said that the rules are “not lenient” and that she is considering leaving the hostel by next session.
The hostel’s facilities, while functional, are not without their quirks. Daniel noted that the beds in the hostel are “fluffy,” which she found unusual. However, she also praised the hostel’s environment, saying that it is “very comfortable and welcoming.”
As the debate over the rules continues, one thing is clear: the rules in the new female hostel are a subject of controversy and disagreement. While some students see the rules as necessary and beneficial, others feel that they are restrictive and stifling.
The implications of the rules extend beyond the hostel itself, raising questions about the balance between discipline and freedom. As one student noted, the rules can make it difficult for students to relax and express themselves.
In the end, the rules in the New Female Hostel are a complex issue with no easy answers. While the hostel’s administrators may see the rules as necessary, students like Abigail and Daniel are left to navigate the challenges and restrictions imposed by the rules.
As the hostel continues to grow and evolve, it remains to be seen whether the rules will be revised or relaxed. One thing is certain, however: the debate over the rules in the new female hostel is far from over.
The hostel’s atmosphere is generally quiet and studious, with an emphasis on maintaining a noise-free environment. This can be both a blessing and a curse, as students who value peace and quiet may thrive in this environment, while those who prefer a more social and lively atmosphere may find it stifling.
The rules also raise questions about the role of discipline in education. While some argue that strict rules are necessary to maintain order and focus, others believe that such rules can be overly restrictive and stifle creativity and individuality.
As the residents of the new female hostel continue to navigate these complex issues, it is clear that the debate over the rules is just the beginning. The hostel’s residents, administrators, and patrons will need to work together to find a balance between discipline and freedom, and to create an environment that supports the academic, emotional, and social needs of all students.
Reported by Monday Eunice Olohi (Hostel Correspondent)
Edited by Isama Anyaole Peace
